翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v JA ・ R v Jim ・ R v Jobidon ・ R v Jones ・ R v Jordan ・ R v Jorgensen ・ R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge ・ R v K ・ R v Kang-Brown ・ R v Kapp ・ R v Keegstra ・ R v Kewelram ・ R v Khan ・ R v Khan (South Africa) ・ R v Khelawon ・ R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ・ R v Korsten ・ R v Kouri ・ R v Krymowski ・ R v Laba ・ R v Labaye ・ R v Ladouceur ・ R v Latimer ・ R v Latimer (1997) ・ R v Lavallee ・ R v Lawrence ・ R v Leary ・ R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ・ R v Lifchus ・ R v Lipman Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ''R v. Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia'' () HCA 10; (1956) 94 CLR 254 (2 March 1956) was a case in which the High Court of Australia held that the judicial power of the Commonwealth could not be vested in a tribunal that also exercised non-judicial functions. Although the court's reasons did not examine the fundamental justifications for the separation of judicial and executive powers, this case is one of the foundations for that doctrine in Australian law. The significance of the case was that it restricted the use of judicial power to Chapter III courts (under the Australian Constitution), also established that these courts could exercise no other power. In this way, it set a high standard for the separation of judicial power. ==References== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.